|
Post by Devyn_Baby on May 4, 2008 10:42:10 GMT -5
That's the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Dee on May 4, 2008 11:08:49 GMT -5
Care to give us the reasons why?
|
|
|
Post by admin on May 4, 2008 13:01:41 GMT -5
Ohhh, haha!
|
|
|
Post by Dee on May 4, 2008 17:16:53 GMT -5
She wants to send them all back where they came from, or at least out of there.
|
|
|
Post by Devyn_Baby on May 4, 2008 19:41:37 GMT -5
Not to gang up on the New Yorkers, but jeez! I want to ask all of them if New York is that bad!
|
|
|
Post by admin on May 4, 2008 20:27:31 GMT -5
Ohio is lame..
Or, I see this one coming.. 'Ohio is for lovers!'
|
|
|
Post by Dee on May 4, 2008 22:28:08 GMT -5
Not to gang up on the New Yorkers, but jeez! I want to ask all of them if New York is that bad! New York is great, but it's way too expensive to live here. That's mainly why people leave.
|
|
|
Post by admin on May 5, 2008 14:24:54 GMT -5
New York is fun to visit
|
|
|
Post by Devyn_Baby on May 5, 2008 15:24:02 GMT -5
I don't know anyone from Ohio. Haha.
|
|
|
Post by goalie31 on May 5, 2008 16:39:52 GMT -5
Care to give us the reasons why? I just dont think its right, if it was then it would be legal in more states. I dont like it
|
|
|
Post by Devyn_Baby on May 5, 2008 16:57:26 GMT -5
Why do you think its not right?
|
|
|
Post by Dee on May 6, 2008 0:48:25 GMT -5
You can't go by the number of states that legalize it. You must have a personal reason.
|
|
|
Post by xxbrittanyxx on May 6, 2008 17:29:37 GMT -5
the government wants to control everything..they would control who loves who if they could...
|
|
|
Post by admin on May 15, 2008 15:52:13 GMT -5
SAN FRANCISCO(AP) In a monumental victory for the gay rights movement, the California Supreme Court overturned a voter-approved ban on gay marriage Thursday in a ruling that would allow same-sex couples in the nation's biggest state to tie the knot.
Domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage, the justices ruled 4-3 in striking down the ban.
Outside the courthouse, gay marriage supporters cried and cheered as the news spread.
Jeanie Rizzo, one of the plaintiffs, called Pali Cooper, her partner of 19 years, and asked, "Pali, will you marry me?"
"This is a very historic day. This is just such freedom for us," Rizzo said. "This is a message that says all of us are entitled to human dignity."
In the Castro, historically a center of the gay community in San Francisco, Tim Oviatt started crying while watching the news on TV.
"I've been waiting for this all my life," he said. "This is a life-affirming moment."
The city of San Francisco, two dozen gay and lesbian couples and gay rights groups sued in March 2004 after the court halted the monthlong wedding march that took place when Mayor Gavin Newsom opened the doors of City Hall to same-sex marriages.
"Today the California Supreme Court took a giant leap to ensure that everybody _ not just in the state of California, but throughout the country _ will have equal treatment under the law," said City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who argued the case for San Francisco.
The challenge for gay rights advocates, however, is not over.
A coalition of religious and social conservative groups is attempting to put a measure on the November ballot that would enshrine laws banning gay marriage in the state constitution.
|
|
|
Post by Dee on May 15, 2008 16:58:45 GMT -5
Yeah, i just read that.
|
|